Three Social Theories And Polygamy

Polygamy and Social TheoriesSocieties typic separately(prenominal)y set up clear boundaries for satisfying behavior , in to maintain some degree of wholeness within the group . Although some behaviors that fall outside the average might pass without comment , some groups deviate significantly from the norm , forming sub-cultures . In some cases , sub-cultures that deviate significantly atomic number 18 looked upon with hesitancy . Polygamy is one behavior that deviates significantly from the accepted norms our inn looks upon groups that habituate polygamy such(prenominal) as the Fundamental Latter-Day Saints (FLDS , with suspicion and often with distrustSeveral theories that discuss how individuals interact within association reach significance when used to examine polygamy . In this society , we practice serial monogamy that is , an individual may conduct much than one partner over a lifetime , scarce is in a committed and exclusive relationship with nevertheless one partner at a time (Class Notes . From the fountain of the Mormon Church , of which the FLDS is an offshoot , the polygamous nature of its teachings has been conside tearing laudable of suspicion . To understand the reasoning behind this thinking , it is of the essence(predicate) to examine polygamy from the viewpoints of symbolic interactionism , structural functionalism , and conflict theory to have an idea of how the practice interacts on both macro and micro levels of cultureSymbolic Interactionism and PolygamySymbolic interaction theory examines society at a micro level determining how individuals learn the meanings of things in their environment (Ballantine , 2006 . In the United States , children soon learn to identify the Stars and Stripes as being the national flag , they learn about apparitional symbols appropriate to their family , and maybe even the logos of their favorite games , restaurants , or television programs . Over time , they learn otherwise(a) symbols , such as words and monetary values and many other things . The symbols learned during this process summarize shared meanings with others with whom we interact and rig what is real and normal (Ballantine , 2006 ,. 86 .

In the polygamous residential area , the child learns the symbols of what is normal in that subculture at a real early age . The family is composed of one father and many mothers the representation of the faith , at least in footing of the Fundamental Latter-Day Saints , is that of a photograph of the prophet that hangs on the wall of the family home . The games restaurants , and programs that may have meaning to other children have in the FLDS community , in that televisions are command providing no context to the children in the community . Kathy quoted in brownness describes how the prophet Rulon Jeffs was kept changing the context of things even in his own community : some days wearing garments with stripes were bad , other days the color red became forbidden Looking and smiling at members of the opposite invoke was wrong . Symbols such as colors , patterns , and expressions became stripped of all meaning that the greater society provided themStructural Functionalism and PolygamyAccording to Ballantine (2006 ) structural functionalists view society as being composed of interdependent parts , each fulfilling certain necessary functions...If you want to get a wide of the mark essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .