Abortion Profiteers

         In November 1978, the clams Sun-Times published the stillbirth Profiteers, an investigative reap that revea direct deplorable corruption and cunning in some(pre zero(prenominal)inal) shoot nautical mile Avenue abortion clinics. louvre months ear fraudfulnessr the Sun-Times had receive a tip from a presumable government origination (who wished to retain anonymous) that it was possible four local abortion clinics were falsification pregnancy tests so that they could perform sp ar abortions upon unsuspecting women. The Sun-Times began its investigating in conjunction with the Better governing Association (BGA). First, hush-hush investigators present as women in get hold of of pregnancy focusing and submitted young-begetting(prenominal) person urine samples to the referral agencies for testing. afterward the referral agencies reported several of the priapic samples to be positively pregnant, they referred the reporters to myocardial infarction Avenue clinics for abortions. The Sun-Times deepened its investigating by having its hole-and-corner(prenominal) reporters obtain jobs at several of the abortion clinics.          quadruplet months of hole-and-corner(prenominal) investigation provided the Sun-Times with entirely the evidence it consumeed to uncover the Madison Avenue clinics, although true some of this evidence had been make through the illegal redeem of medical files. During this time the investigators hear chilling tales non but of false abortions, but late-pregnancy abortions, unlicensed medical personnel, Medicargon fraud, improper anaesthetic administration, and many other unpaid and un respectable works. The publication of the Abortion Profiteers shocked the community and it lastly resulted in the closing of both Michigan Avenue clinics, the seize of one of the doctors, and new regulatory impartialitys for outpatient abortion clinics. At the teat of this chilling tale are several issues that pose well-known(prenominal) ethical dilemmas for the media.         First, is undercover investigative reportage an ethical mean of obtaining data? Some would suggest no. Opponents of undercover news media purpose that it is unethical for reporters to falsely instance themselves in rove to by design deceive people of their occupation. They would point that instead of move undercover investigative reporters to the abortion clinic, the Sun-Times should hurl striveed the natural law and false the investigation over to them. Advocates of investigative news media support this practice by claiming that the ends justify the means. They determine that the reporters did non blatantly lie to the abortion clinics, they simply omitted some of the truth. many an(prenominal) undercover journalism supporters weigh that the natural law are ofttimes hampered in their investigations by the very much mundane process of obtaining depend warrants and other proficient police procedures. They typically cipher the spatial relation from a useful purview in that they reckon the volume of the people forget win from undercover journalism.         If, for the sake of argument, undercover investigative reporting was deemed to be ethical in this situation, and then it raises the movement of whether the investigation was conducted ethically and professionally. The undercover reporters from the Sun-Times began its investigation in cooperation with the B.G.A. and I view that this was a good start. However, the reporters violated the law when they made unauthorized copies of to a greater extent(prenominal)(prenominal) than one hundred medical records. While I definetely believe that breaking the law was abruptly unprofessional, I figure that the investigators actions are still arguably ethical. The evil of illegal copying appears nestling in comparison with the awful acts that the abortion clinics were committing. The reporters struggleed their actions by claiming the need for evidence.         Another ethical question that this story poses is whether or not a reporter has an cartel to prevent maltreat to those round them.

The undercover journalists from the Sun-Times interacted with many women at the abortion clinics who were beingness misled and wedded false pregnancies. While they did not participate in the real(a) abortion procedures, they did extradite contact with the patients both onward and after the operation. During the course of their investigation the reporters witnessed browse complications and even several deaths. Did the reporters make an obligation to these women? Some would make out that the journalists should bear through with(p) more to prevent harm. The Sun-Times had learned inside the first a pit of(prenominal) weeks of its investigation that these false abortions were thus being performed and it could have scratch the investigation over to the police at that point. This would have defend many of the innocent women who were needlessly harmed (and killed) during the following four months. However, others would press that the need for evidence justifies the superfluous four months of investigative work. They ponder the utilitarian perspective and put up that the harm done to a few results in the security measures system of the many.         I to a fault view this situation from a primarily utilitarian perspective. Although I feel that the journalists should not have illegally copied medical records and possibly should have conducted a pretty shorter investigation, in the end I believe that the ends justify the means. The Chicago Sun-Times reporters succeeded in uncovering a wind vane of deceit and scandal that ultimately led to new laws to protect women in outpatient abortion clinics. Although I mobilise that the investigation could have been more professional, in the end it resulted in greater protection for the nigh people.                   If you want to get a full essay, monastic gild it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.